SilvorX
Oct 13, 09:22 PM
Originally posted by arn
anonymous source:
17" iMacs
40, 60, 80 GB
800, 933, 1GHZ
1GB Ram
Don't know how likely... we'll see soon enough.
arn
that'dd be pretty nice, but idd say mwsf also
anonymous source:
17" iMacs
40, 60, 80 GB
800, 933, 1GHZ
1GB Ram
Don't know how likely... we'll see soon enough.
arn
that'dd be pretty nice, but idd say mwsf also
noekozz
Apr 28, 01:46 PM
iClarified (http://www.iclarified.com/).
woops, haven't had my lunch yet.
Also, if you're concerned about having to restore all your apps, d/l aptbackup, It'll relieve that headache.
woops, haven't had my lunch yet.
Also, if you're concerned about having to restore all your apps, d/l aptbackup, It'll relieve that headache.
Eidorian
Dec 16, 12:12 PM
http://www.xe.com/ucc/
I use this site for my conversions.
$400 = �225
$500 = �282
So yeah, you're right.
I use this site for my conversions.
$400 = �225
$500 = �282
So yeah, you're right.
ScientistRyan
May 1, 07:27 PM
ShareTool by yazsoft will allow all your bonjour services to work through your VPN just as they do locally. This is the solution I use, and it works perfectly, even itunes home sharing works. This is the only solution I could find as from what I can tell Apple has designed bonjour to not work over VPN.
http://www.yazsoft.com/products/sharetool/
http://www.yazsoft.com/products/sharetool/
zen.state
Apr 5, 01:10 PM
I also read that the Quad's failure rating is around 1 percent compared to the dual 2.5 from 2004 and dual 2.7 from early 2005 - am I correct?
Not correct at all. Even the most reliable G5 ever (dual 2.3) has a failure rate of 11%. The worst is the first gen. dual 2.0GHz at 32%. No G5 model could ever even dream of having a single digit failure rate.
G5 tower reliability research results based on actual Apple service records (http://www.macintouch.com/reliability/pmg5.html)
Not correct at all. Even the most reliable G5 ever (dual 2.3) has a failure rate of 11%. The worst is the first gen. dual 2.0GHz at 32%. No G5 model could ever even dream of having a single digit failure rate.
G5 tower reliability research results based on actual Apple service records (http://www.macintouch.com/reliability/pmg5.html)
Nermal
Sep 13, 04:21 PM
Steal: To take (the property of another) without right or permission.
When you copy something, you're not taking it. The original is still there.
When you copy something, you're not taking it. The original is still there.
cyclingsessions
May 6, 08:00 AM
Can someone tell me why the Mac is so finicky about what kind of memory you upgrade with?
I have been ok with Corsair 8gb upgrade memory, which many on this forum had suggested, for a while but noticed lately that I am getting the dreaded restart box lockup when I am trying to back up with time machine a ways into the process.
I put the OEM 4gb back in and it is working ok.
Can someone explain to me why it passes 30 minutes of memory testing on Techtools Pro software but freezes once in while on handbrake video encoding and always on the backup???:mad:
Thanks
I have been ok with Corsair 8gb upgrade memory, which many on this forum had suggested, for a while but noticed lately that I am getting the dreaded restart box lockup when I am trying to back up with time machine a ways into the process.
I put the OEM 4gb back in and it is working ok.
Can someone explain to me why it passes 30 minutes of memory testing on Techtools Pro software but freezes once in while on handbrake video encoding and always on the backup???:mad:
Thanks
Bengt77
Nov 7, 04:03 AM
Not all Sennheisers are for home use. And neither are all Sennheisers very expensive. (http://www.amazon.com/Sennheiser-HD-212-HD-212-Headphones/dp/B000065BPA/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1257588035&sr=8-5)
The model I linked to above even has a detachable cable, so you could get a shorter cable and use that.
The model I linked to above even has a detachable cable, so you could get a shorter cable and use that.
UniqueScotsman
Mar 26, 05:24 PM
As far as I know, Comex (@comex) has had it jailbroken since Mar 14th (tethered) and will release it when it's ready for public consumption. Hopefully days, but could be weeks, I guess...
Comex has gotten it jailbroken on the 14th but it still needs a little refining, it is Untethered not tethered as its userland exploit, which means it will work by just following instructions on the ipad then using a mac/pc
Comex has gotten it jailbroken on the 14th but it still needs a little refining, it is Untethered not tethered as its userland exploit, which means it will work by just following instructions on the ipad then using a mac/pc
Claude626
Nov 11, 10:58 AM
Hello MacRumors,
I'm very surprised that you had removed(or was it never there?) the breadcrumbs at the bottom of any forum page. I find this very counter intuitive.
By the time the user reach the bottom of a long thread page, I think the most common actions would be to either want to move to a different page of the same thread or to go back to the section page with listings of all the thread titles. In my case, I ALWAYS want to go back to the section page so I can select another thread to view. Currently... there is no breadcrumb at the bottom that I can quickly jump back out of the thread.
There's always the back button on the browser... However, that's practical only if the thread is single page(or I can even stand 2-3 pages, just a few more back clicks, right?). What if I've dwelved a good 10 or so pages into a long thread? Or I'm jumping around a REALLY long thread to try to find something? I would have to scroll all the way up just to find the breadcrumb at the top. Very annoying...
It may seem like a trivial thing and I'm nit picky... but imagine that this repeated annoyance happens nearly every time you view a multi-page thread... I realize that there is the "Forum Jump" menu, but that either requires 2 clicks or you must scroll... Why can't we have both? Jumping else where with "Forum Jump" or simply single click to jump back up a tree.
Also on a side note... your breadcrumb at the top of the forum page is broken in FireFox. The "trigger box" for the "MacRumors Forums" link is a huge box that overlays the next few items in the breadcrumb. Essentially, making the neighboring links useless because it would fire the "MacRumors Forums" link instead.
Please bring back the bottom breadcrumb... It's the most logical place to offer navigational links since the user is most likely done with reading and would like to browse else where.
Please fix the top breadcrumb when viewed in FireFox...
Thanks!
I'm very surprised that you had removed(or was it never there?) the breadcrumbs at the bottom of any forum page. I find this very counter intuitive.
By the time the user reach the bottom of a long thread page, I think the most common actions would be to either want to move to a different page of the same thread or to go back to the section page with listings of all the thread titles. In my case, I ALWAYS want to go back to the section page so I can select another thread to view. Currently... there is no breadcrumb at the bottom that I can quickly jump back out of the thread.
There's always the back button on the browser... However, that's practical only if the thread is single page(or I can even stand 2-3 pages, just a few more back clicks, right?). What if I've dwelved a good 10 or so pages into a long thread? Or I'm jumping around a REALLY long thread to try to find something? I would have to scroll all the way up just to find the breadcrumb at the top. Very annoying...
It may seem like a trivial thing and I'm nit picky... but imagine that this repeated annoyance happens nearly every time you view a multi-page thread... I realize that there is the "Forum Jump" menu, but that either requires 2 clicks or you must scroll... Why can't we have both? Jumping else where with "Forum Jump" or simply single click to jump back up a tree.
Also on a side note... your breadcrumb at the top of the forum page is broken in FireFox. The "trigger box" for the "MacRumors Forums" link is a huge box that overlays the next few items in the breadcrumb. Essentially, making the neighboring links useless because it would fire the "MacRumors Forums" link instead.
Please bring back the bottom breadcrumb... It's the most logical place to offer navigational links since the user is most likely done with reading and would like to browse else where.
Please fix the top breadcrumb when viewed in FireFox...
Thanks!
MacNut
Mar 7, 02:34 PM
Everyone who pays you doesn't withhold Social Security. Only if you're an official employee. How is it withheld from your ebay or other income profits or if you're freelance? You have to turn in quarterly returns if you're freelance. When you sell items you pay on your profit minus expenses.How many people file when they sell something on ebay. Do they go by the amount you sell or every transaction? I am sure ebay could set up a system to track sales.
JohnDoe98
Mar 29, 09:52 PM
Because it isn't finished yet. You want a buggy JB?
G5Unit
Nov 23, 12:56 PM
I saw 1 go for 12k! Crazy!
Goldinboy17
May 6, 12:01 PM
It's saying it on both iTunes & the phone, so would this be some sort of horrific software coincidence or a hardware fault do you reckon?
Try restoring it as new? I have not a clue as to why it's only showing 12GB's they are supposed to average at about 14.3.
Try restoring it as new? I have not a clue as to why it's only showing 12GB's they are supposed to average at about 14.3.
Abstract
Oct 4, 09:07 AM
Using GSP and Iphoto only makes sense if the photo's have the GSP location information as part of the photo. So that mean that the Camera taking the picture has a GSP reciever in it, which is great outside, but GPS does not work indoors
Yeah, that, and this would work better for world travellers. Who wants to see a map where every photo points to the same house or area? In many ways it's a pointless feature, but in some cases it will be a lot of fun, such as vacation photos. :)
Yeah, that, and this would work better for world travellers. Who wants to see a map where every photo points to the same house or area? In many ways it's a pointless feature, but in some cases it will be a lot of fun, such as vacation photos. :)
rburns
Sep 29, 01:47 PM
I'm trying to choose between a new stock-configured Dual GHz from Apple and a 3-month-old QS which includes a 3-yr. AppleCare plan (minus 3 mos.), a gig of ram, a SuperDrive, and an external 40-gig Maxtor FW drive--each one for the approximate same price ($2350). In other words, at the educator's price, I can get the new one at about the same price as the used one w/extras. On the other hand, the used one's AppleCare will not cover the 17" Apple LCD Display I'll be buying later w/out a rebate; whereas, Apple's currently offering a $200 rebate when customers buy the cpu and display together.
Because benchtests reveal little difference in performance between these two models, and some posters have even complained about noise problems and little gain in overall speed in the current line, I'm wondering which will offer the best bang for the buck. I'll eventually be using FCP3 burning DVDs on whatever I get, but I'm unsure of the difference between them. I've seen that everymac.com lists the street value of the QS Feb 2002 dual GHz as worth a few hundred more than the current stock-configured dual GHz, and that these were going fast in August when smalldog and others had a few still in stock. Moreover, the used one also offers the extra warranty.
As an educator, am I better off w/one of the new ones and buying an Apple monitor at the same time, or going w/the "older" model and buying a monitor later w/out the AppleCare plan or rebate?
I could really use some input, especially since there's few reviews available on the new models, and I'm unsure how big of a difference there is between the 167MHz bus speed and the older 133, or the type of RAM each uses. The extra expansion bays are not really necessary in my work, either.
Thanks in advance for any help,
Rick
Because benchtests reveal little difference in performance between these two models, and some posters have even complained about noise problems and little gain in overall speed in the current line, I'm wondering which will offer the best bang for the buck. I'll eventually be using FCP3 burning DVDs on whatever I get, but I'm unsure of the difference between them. I've seen that everymac.com lists the street value of the QS Feb 2002 dual GHz as worth a few hundred more than the current stock-configured dual GHz, and that these were going fast in August when smalldog and others had a few still in stock. Moreover, the used one also offers the extra warranty.
As an educator, am I better off w/one of the new ones and buying an Apple monitor at the same time, or going w/the "older" model and buying a monitor later w/out the AppleCare plan or rebate?
I could really use some input, especially since there's few reviews available on the new models, and I'm unsure how big of a difference there is between the 167MHz bus speed and the older 133, or the type of RAM each uses. The extra expansion bays are not really necessary in my work, either.
Thanks in advance for any help,
Rick
eternlgladiator
Feb 23, 09:17 AM
mac2sell.com gives a pretty good baseline but its really only worth but people are will to pay for it. I've been trying to get rid of mine for a week. Hopefully it moves so I can upgrade.
eawmp1
Apr 22, 10:14 PM
When in doubt, Google. http://www.google.com/search?q=carolyn+samit&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&client=safari
zblaxberg
Mar 25, 10:17 AM
You should be able to use Compressor to convert NTSC to Pal and then you'll probably need something like Mpegstreamclip to convert it to an AVI file. I can't understand why they'd want to use an AVI though.
Shaneuk
Mar 17, 04:18 PM
Carter Pewterschmidt - "Hey Bill Gates, can you help me program my Zune? Oh wait, I have an iPod, like the rest of the world."
mkrishnan
Dec 30, 09:44 AM
The NX bit in AMD K8 CPUs and Execute Disable bit in Intel CPUs are there to prevent buffer overflow exploits.
http://www.intel.com/business/bss/infrastructure/security/xdbit.htm
Thank you for the link! :)
So it says it's on the Pentium 4 line, and I'm assuming it's on the Pentium M as well? Is it on current Celerons?
Interesting that it is not supported by the latest Win2k. I guess that actually is one of the first relevant reasons to upgrade to XP! :eek: :o
http://www.intel.com/business/bss/infrastructure/security/xdbit.htm
Thank you for the link! :)
So it says it's on the Pentium 4 line, and I'm assuming it's on the Pentium M as well? Is it on current Celerons?
Interesting that it is not supported by the latest Win2k. I guess that actually is one of the first relevant reasons to upgrade to XP! :eek: :o
natey
Dec 31, 12:31 AM
I don't like the colors. And too much info, looks bloated.
I like the old one better, simple and clean.
I like the old one better, simple and clean.
Macnoviz
Oct 26, 03:55 PM
Oh please... :rolleyes: This is a stupid drawing, the iPod is not gonna look like this. The Apple engineers know what they are doing.
We would have to compare the current ipod with it's patent sketches to know how different it can be
We would have to compare the current ipod with it's patent sketches to know how different it can be
InSides
Apr 7, 08:24 PM
The Boot Camp drivers provided by Apple aren't that great, especially for the trackpad and the brightness controls. When I'm dragging and dropping files in Windows 7 on my MacBook Pro, I tend to press down with one finger and drag with another finger.
I have my trackpad set up on Windows 7 and OS X to have it so that the bottom left corner is left click and the bottom right is right click. Tap to click is disabled.
So, basically, I cannot have "tap-to-click" and have "press down with one finger and drag with another finger" at the same time.
That sucks.
I have my trackpad set up on Windows 7 and OS X to have it so that the bottom left corner is left click and the bottom right is right click. Tap to click is disabled.
So, basically, I cannot have "tap-to-click" and have "press down with one finger and drag with another finger" at the same time.
That sucks.
No comments:
Post a Comment