guzhogi
Apr 12, 11:36 AM
they're not using a hack. They're using actual access to the Apple database (which is why the unlock happens through iTunes)
I wonder how these companies got access to Apple's database. Why doesn't Apple keep better watch on it? And couldn't Apple just find out who's been accessing the database, and not allow connections from that source anymore? This all seems shady to me.
I wonder how these companies got access to Apple's database. Why doesn't Apple keep better watch on it? And couldn't Apple just find out who's been accessing the database, and not allow connections from that source anymore? This all seems shady to me.
Gloor
Jan 16, 05:59 AM
I have to say that my loyalty to Apple dropped a bit. Mac Pro really tested my patience and the update was definately worth it but why in the hell did they not update ACDs to go with it? I really hope they will do silent update this week so I can buy my MP+ACD and forget Apple for few months (until I have money for a notebook) :)
.jpg "wiz khalifa hair streak. black")
nykansukee
Dec 9, 11:41 PM
Better be cheaper
balamw
Sep 12, 07:35 PM
- iTunes 7 will confirm if you wish to re-download content
What does that mean. :confused:
Can I redownload any TV Shows in 640x480 (crosses fingers) :p
B
What does that mean. :confused:
Can I redownload any TV Shows in 640x480 (crosses fingers) :p
B
idea_hamster
Aug 7, 06:30 PM
If I were an MS shareholder, I would be OUTRAGED.
How much did they pay for that? To be fair, I don't recall if MS bought just VPC or all of Connectix, but it hardly matters!
That's got to be a giant pile of shareholder wealth pissed away in a half-assed attempt at being part of (read: smothering) the increasing popularity and utility of Apple.
I would really love to see the numbers on that boondogle.
:rolleyes:
Additionally:
Yes, Parallels and VMware are better products, but that is not the point. Has no one else noticed the number of products Microsoft is canceling for the Mac. I do not believe that Microsoft sees a market for the Macintosh. This of course is purely a business perspective.
I for one think Apple will be taught a lesson in respect. The only logical solution is to kill off Mac Office universal binary support. If they want to run on the Intel platform, they can run on emulation.
It would not be much of a loss if Microsoft decided to pull the plug. Don't think they haven't taught about it. A three percent market share or 19 million desktop users does not even come close to the numbers that still use Windows 2000, never mind Windows 98. I of course don't wish this to happen, but it is one logical outcome.
I actually think that MS will eventually be taught the lesson. Unfortunately for MS, federal antitrust law states that you can't use your power in one market to gain power in a different market.
At first glance to me, killing Office for Mac is probably a violation, since I think that the operation is, in itself, profitable. After all, the "at cost" price for Mac Office that MS charges its employees (yes, they can buy it!) is $50.
How much did they pay for that? To be fair, I don't recall if MS bought just VPC or all of Connectix, but it hardly matters!
That's got to be a giant pile of shareholder wealth pissed away in a half-assed attempt at being part of (read: smothering) the increasing popularity and utility of Apple.
I would really love to see the numbers on that boondogle.
:rolleyes:
Additionally:
Yes, Parallels and VMware are better products, but that is not the point. Has no one else noticed the number of products Microsoft is canceling for the Mac. I do not believe that Microsoft sees a market for the Macintosh. This of course is purely a business perspective.
I for one think Apple will be taught a lesson in respect. The only logical solution is to kill off Mac Office universal binary support. If they want to run on the Intel platform, they can run on emulation.
It would not be much of a loss if Microsoft decided to pull the plug. Don't think they haven't taught about it. A three percent market share or 19 million desktop users does not even come close to the numbers that still use Windows 2000, never mind Windows 98. I of course don't wish this to happen, but it is one logical outcome.
I actually think that MS will eventually be taught the lesson. Unfortunately for MS, federal antitrust law states that you can't use your power in one market to gain power in a different market.
At first glance to me, killing Office for Mac is probably a violation, since I think that the operation is, in itself, profitable. After all, the "at cost" price for Mac Office that MS charges its employees (yes, they can buy it!) is $50.
Laser47
Dec 15, 05:25 PM
I think you need to set it as slave, there should be jumper pins on it aswell.
TheShinyMac
Apr 3, 04:47 PM
Ouch, I guess the world is ending in 2012. :mad:
I'll see you on the other side :rolleyes: But on a serious note. This is horrible to hear. I just finished watching "the day the wave came" on youtube and then this came up. If you haven't seen it, you should. Its not for the faint of heart.
I'll see you on the other side :rolleyes: But on a serious note. This is horrible to hear. I just finished watching "the day the wave came" on youtube and then this came up. If you haven't seen it, you should. Its not for the faint of heart.
CS-Ryan
Apr 7, 01:37 PM
Hey all,
My boss is having an issue with his MacBook and InDesign.
First off let me say that we have CS4 installed on both the aformentioned MacBook as well as a new iMac we purchased for the office. But here's the deal, as soon as we start up InDesign on the MacBook after JUST MOVING THE MOUSE i get the "color wheel" and it just FREEZES and it stays there for ever, i let it "load" for about 5-10, even 20 minutes!
So I updated the software on the MacBook, updated the software on CS4- still the same problem.
Then, I UNINSTALLED CS4 on the MacBook, then Re-Installed it, just to have the same exact problem.
All my CS programs work perfectly fine on our iMac, but JUST InDesign doesnt work on the laptop. PLEASE HELP :(
I guess my question is :
1) Has this ever happened to any of you?
2) Is there a common solution to this problem?
3) Is there a phone number i can call for trouble shooting Adobe products? (i cannot seem to locate one on my CS4 disc or case)
Thank you all in advance :)
Ryan
My boss is having an issue with his MacBook and InDesign.
First off let me say that we have CS4 installed on both the aformentioned MacBook as well as a new iMac we purchased for the office. But here's the deal, as soon as we start up InDesign on the MacBook after JUST MOVING THE MOUSE i get the "color wheel" and it just FREEZES and it stays there for ever, i let it "load" for about 5-10, even 20 minutes!
So I updated the software on the MacBook, updated the software on CS4- still the same problem.
Then, I UNINSTALLED CS4 on the MacBook, then Re-Installed it, just to have the same exact problem.
All my CS programs work perfectly fine on our iMac, but JUST InDesign doesnt work on the laptop. PLEASE HELP :(
I guess my question is :
1) Has this ever happened to any of you?
2) Is there a common solution to this problem?
3) Is there a phone number i can call for trouble shooting Adobe products? (i cannot seem to locate one on my CS4 disc or case)
Thank you all in advance :)
Ryan
ender land
May 3, 06:22 PM
Whenever I paste or delete the following excerpt within xcode, it gets unbelievably slow (probably 30 second time from "cmd v" to actually showing the text)
//add all times to that value
for (multimap<PathID, double>::iterator i = pathTimes.first; i != pathTimes.second; i++) {
if (temp == 0) {
firstPathID = (*i).first;
firstPathIDtime = (*i).second;
}
if (temp == 1) {
secondPathID = (*i).first;
secondPathIDtime = (*i).second;
}
temp++;
}
Is there something within that causing the problem?
//add all times to that value
for (multimap<PathID, double>::iterator i = pathTimes.first; i != pathTimes.second; i++) {
if (temp == 0) {
firstPathID = (*i).first;
firstPathIDtime = (*i).second;
}
if (temp == 1) {
secondPathID = (*i).first;
secondPathIDtime = (*i).second;
}
temp++;
}
Is there something within that causing the problem?
Moustache
May 4, 07:07 PM
Thanks,
I already did the PRAM reset but still issues, I didn't try SMC yet.
Will tell you guys.
Thanks
E
I already did the PRAM reset but still issues, I didn't try SMC yet.
Will tell you guys.
Thanks
E
ezekielrage_99
Aug 7, 08:57 PM
so does this mean VPC for mac is now free?:confused:
Nothing from MS is free....
Nothing from MS is free....
VegasMac
Feb 21, 06:28 PM
sweet thanks
brepublican
Oct 26, 09:46 AM
Wow. Let's hope it looks better than that diagram.
For real. It'd kinda suck not to have the touch click wheel we've seen on most of the mockups. I actually love some of those floating around more than whats dipicted here...
Which brings me to my other point, could people please stop making friggin' mockups??? They'll only make us disappointed when the real deal comes out :mad:
For real. It'd kinda suck not to have the touch click wheel we've seen on most of the mockups. I actually love some of those floating around more than whats dipicted here...
Which brings me to my other point, could people please stop making friggin' mockups??? They'll only make us disappointed when the real deal comes out :mad:
nanofrog
May 6, 01:27 PM
So I have now upgraded the Mac Pro with 2x X5690 and they work great. Only thing concerning me is the temperature for processor A is like 6 degrees higher when idle (B 28, A 33) and up to 12 degrees celcius higher when stress testing in Prime95 in OSX. Using iStat, it unfortunately shows only the average temp for all cores on any one CPU and not temp for each core. Is these anything available for OSX that will show all core temps?
I doubt it's a case of heatsink having poor contact with CPU due to thermal grease having gaps etc. Because the temperatures are still in the norm, it's just that CPU B is really cool. After about 15 min in Prime95 it sort of averages 63 for CPU B and 72 for CPU A and these 1366 chips can safely do 78/80 as far as I recall.
Not worth remounting you reckon ? I applied even amounts of MX-4 to both chips and covered their surface entirely.
What are the temps under stress testing?
A couple of things to note:
wiz khalifa hair braided.
wiz khalifa hair dyed. wiz
wiz khalifa hairstyle 2011.
wiz khalifa hair dyed. megan
Wiz Khalifa x Pittsburgh
I doubt it's a case of heatsink having poor contact with CPU due to thermal grease having gaps etc. Because the temperatures are still in the norm, it's just that CPU B is really cool. After about 15 min in Prime95 it sort of averages 63 for CPU B and 72 for CPU A and these 1366 chips can safely do 78/80 as far as I recall.
Not worth remounting you reckon ? I applied even amounts of MX-4 to both chips and covered their surface entirely.
What are the temps under stress testing?
A couple of things to note:
lu0s3r322
Mar 21, 04:43 PM
i0nic said he would release a jailbreak by this coming weekend
Michaelgtrusa
Mar 2, 05:51 AM
They will get nothing unless they strike.
Coleman2010
Mar 30, 12:50 PM
I sold my iPad 1 which was jailbroken on 4.2.1. Since buying my iPad 2 the jailbreak is biggest thing I miss. I'm staying on 4.3 until we know which version the jailbreak will work on!
Same here. Sold my jailbroken iPad 1 and bought an iPad 2. I missed my jaillbroken apps.
...Waiting patiently for the jailbreak.
Same here. Sold my jailbroken iPad 1 and bought an iPad 2. I missed my jaillbroken apps.
...Waiting patiently for the jailbreak.
Xeem
Sep 11, 10:52 AM
I was starting Trig in my Junior year of High School. They wouldn't even let us watch TV that day (trying to keep everyone calm, etc.), other than a couple teachers that were more interested in what was going on than school policy.
chiefpavvy
Apr 12, 09:38 PM
It is really simple...it doesn't cost $170 and does not involve quite as risky behavior. :eek:
It also can't, and won't, unlock iPhones...UltraSn0w is only good up to baseband 5.13.x on 3GS and 1.59.00 on iPhone 4. Particularly for the latter, you only have 2 choices if you have a newer baseband. The SIM interposers (Gevey, Rebel, etc) or this method. I'm inclined to lean to this method as the interposers are rather expensive (Rebel is nearly $80) and can be a PITA. This is pretty seamless and painless, except for the upfront cost.
If they're able to keep this up I expect the price to drop considerably.
It also can't, and won't, unlock iPhones...UltraSn0w is only good up to baseband 5.13.x on 3GS and 1.59.00 on iPhone 4. Particularly for the latter, you only have 2 choices if you have a newer baseband. The SIM interposers (Gevey, Rebel, etc) or this method. I'm inclined to lean to this method as the interposers are rather expensive (Rebel is nearly $80) and can be a PITA. This is pretty seamless and painless, except for the upfront cost.
If they're able to keep this up I expect the price to drop considerably.
wrldwzrd89
Apr 27, 04:46 PM
And that will keep the interactive navigation? Like larkost said, PDF just isn't suitable for what Wiggum wants to do...
Why do you need to change the HTML, Wiggum?
You're right - it won't keep the navigation.
Why do you need to change the HTML, Wiggum?
You're right - it won't keep the navigation.
killmoms
Oct 24, 06:10 PM
The whole resolution independance thing terrifies me. I just know we'll see some vendor or Apple have these annoying huge UI's that we can't shrink back down to their proper size. I mean the reason we buy this huge monitors is to shrink the UI and maximize free space right???
Maybe. But this will allow for things like 1920 x 1200 displays in the 17" MacBook. Not many people would want to run OS X on a screen that size now because everything would be tiny. But let me crank up the GUI scaling and have a higher physical resolution for the UI, so I can read everything but it's all sharper and clearer? **** yeah. Hell, put 1920 x 1200 on a 15.4" panel. 150dpi for the win. Crank up the size and the OS X GUI will look even more wonderful than it does now.
Maybe. But this will allow for things like 1920 x 1200 displays in the 17" MacBook. Not many people would want to run OS X on a screen that size now because everything would be tiny. But let me crank up the GUI scaling and have a higher physical resolution for the UI, so I can read everything but it's all sharper and clearer? **** yeah. Hell, put 1920 x 1200 on a 15.4" panel. 150dpi for the win. Crank up the size and the OS X GUI will look even more wonderful than it does now.
mdntcallr
Oct 4, 08:43 AM
Well, it looks like there will be alot of new features and devices soon from apple.
lets hope apple keeps up the good work, advancements in technology, software and hardware will continue making users lifes easier.
things like smart device/cell phones, itv media center hubs (also HDTV including Blu-Ray), continuing development of more software and making apple an all media type system where all aspects can work seamlessly.
looking forward to the new stuff apple comes with.
lets hope apple keeps up the good work, advancements in technology, software and hardware will continue making users lifes easier.
things like smart device/cell phones, itv media center hubs (also HDTV including Blu-Ray), continuing development of more software and making apple an all media type system where all aspects can work seamlessly.
looking forward to the new stuff apple comes with.
Hattig
Sep 12, 09:24 PM
oh ya, could someone explain what they mean by "gapless playback"?
When you have songs that merge into each other, e.g., a live CD, or lots of dancey CDs or classical CDs, when playing the songs there is no gap between tracks.
This wasn't as simple a solution as you might think, because the encoding of the music (AAC or MP3) encodes into blocks of data of a certain size, so if your song finishes half way through a block, the rest would be empty. I imagine that the reason iTunes has to go through all of the songs to deal with gapless playback is so that it can find the actual end of the song so it can start the next song seamlessly behind it.
When you have songs that merge into each other, e.g., a live CD, or lots of dancey CDs or classical CDs, when playing the songs there is no gap between tracks.
This wasn't as simple a solution as you might think, because the encoding of the music (AAC or MP3) encodes into blocks of data of a certain size, so if your song finishes half way through a block, the rest would be empty. I imagine that the reason iTunes has to go through all of the songs to deal with gapless playback is so that it can find the actual end of the song so it can start the next song seamlessly behind it.
nomar383
Mar 14, 05:11 PM
I'd like to read that if anyone can find it.
Ya some guys brought a big party tent and had two projectors in it. One had XBOX 360 and the other Sportscenter. They also brought a barbecue and made everyone pork and bacon and other stuff. They were awesome.
I'm guessing you didn't get an iPad that day, correct?
I did get one! I was one of the last people. Maybe 50 people behind me by the time I got up there.
I got the Black 32GB Wifi. They ran out of about half the models by the time I got there. This model was my seconds choice, but it's an upgrade from the 16GB Black Wifi model that I was planning to get :D
Ya some guys brought a big party tent and had two projectors in it. One had XBOX 360 and the other Sportscenter. They also brought a barbecue and made everyone pork and bacon and other stuff. They were awesome.
I'm guessing you didn't get an iPad that day, correct?
I did get one! I was one of the last people. Maybe 50 people behind me by the time I got up there.
I got the Black 32GB Wifi. They ran out of about half the models by the time I got there. This model was my seconds choice, but it's an upgrade from the 16GB Black Wifi model that I was planning to get :D
No comments:
Post a Comment