arn
Apr 11, 10:42 AM
Originally posted by dukestreet
Looking really good! Things are shaping up nicely and I like the idea of separtating the 'rumors' threads, makes more sense. I know there had been talk about a game catagory, did that not make the cut? I think it would be a huge boost to the site.
just didn't think there was enough interest.... We'll see....
arn
Looking really good! Things are shaping up nicely and I like the idea of separtating the 'rumors' threads, makes more sense. I know there had been talk about a game catagory, did that not make the cut? I think it would be a huge boost to the site.
just didn't think there was enough interest.... We'll see....
arn
Jaro65
Apr 20, 06:24 PM
What a cash machine. These guys are just printing money these days. What a difference compared to just a few years ago....
Warbrain
May 20, 11:07 AM
Will be posting pics soon.
Can't wait for the pictures. I'm interested.
Can't wait for the pictures. I'm interested.
kalex
Apr 27, 08:50 AM
I'll believe it when I see it :) If it does come out then I'm sure we can get version 1 extracted
mrpuffypants
Dec 31, 01:33 AM
Originally posted by timdorr
Good to see you've been reading AListApart:
http://alistapart.com/articles/slidingdoors/
http://alistapart.com/d/slidingdoors2/v1/ex9.html
Don't think you can steal a design and get away with it ;) :P
ouch. Well, at least it's just the tabs.
Good to see you've been reading AListApart:
http://alistapart.com/articles/slidingdoors/
http://alistapart.com/d/slidingdoors2/v1/ex9.html
Don't think you can steal a design and get away with it ;) :P
ouch. Well, at least it's just the tabs.
whocares
Sep 30, 01:18 PM
AJAX is the next big thing in web development, so yes, brush up on your Javascript and XML skills - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AJAX
Yeah, I know XML, and am looking at XSL and XSLT as I type this. Good stuff. :cool:
What kills me is all this XML stuff is so simple (at least in its philosophy), yet so powerful in what it can do. :eek: :cool:
I've also answered my own question here (http://www.w3schools.com/). :)
Yeah, I know XML, and am looking at XSL and XSLT as I type this. Good stuff. :cool:
What kills me is all this XML stuff is so simple (at least in its philosophy), yet so powerful in what it can do. :eek: :cool:
I've also answered my own question here (http://www.w3schools.com/). :)
100Teraflops
Mar 12, 07:01 PM
I blush, and thanks.
Just make sure that you let us know what it is you do end up with!
A Mini is also not a bad idea.
1) Get a refurbished one to save some bucks. Max out the RAM yourself - save bucks over Apple doing it.
2) Add FW external HDDs for storage. They can be used on a Mac Pro or an iMac later on.
3) With the money saved on the Mini, you can get a high quality monitor. Also transferable to a Mac Pro or an iMac later (as a 2nd monitor). A good monitor can used for several to many years comfortably. Imho, it's better to produce better photos (because the monitor is accurate) and wait some extra seconds, than to get a faster computer but put out photos with inaccurate colour.
4) Start investing in the SW tools that you will want/need. These are also transferable to a new system.
5) When you finally spring for a fully loaded, 24 core, 512MB RAM, 72 TB Storage, 4 graphic cards, 4 Thunderbolt ports iMac Pro Supreme Tower all of the peripherals and software moves too.
It's how I got started. A small Mini with a 23" ACD. Everything I bought to go with it also had to work with a (future) Mac Pro. Eventually I was working with Photoshop files that were approaching 1GB, on a Mini with only 1GB of memory (the days when opening a Mini involved spludging).
There was a lot of HDD thrashing. I was afraid that PS would crash, so I saved often. It took so long to save a big file, that I could go out and mow the lawn or do the dishes while it thrashed away. I got a lot of housework done that summer. Ironically, that Mini never crashed. Not once.
Eventually I got my current Mac Pro, and it was like moving from steam trains to warp drive. All the peripherals and SW moved too, so the only cost was the Mac Pro itself plus the extra HDDs I added at the time.
That Mini then got hooked up the TV where it served up all of our music throughout the house, and movies to the TV for a couple of years. I've upgraded that Mini to a newer one but the first one still works, and I keep it as a spare.
Nah... I just feel sentimental for it. What a workhorse!
Thank You for sharing as that is what I am thinking. I will buy 1333 ram no matter the machine I take home. I saw several refurb minis a few days ago, they were $500 or so.
In This Photo: Julia Mancuso
Julia Mancuso
Julia Mancuso | Super Combined
In This Photo: Julia Mancuso
Digg Dialogg - Julia Mancuso
(Julia Mancuso - Bella)
US Julia Mancuso Smiles
Julia Mancuso is making
Vonn and Julia Mancuso
Best of Julia Mancuso
Julia Mancuso Olympic Skier
American Julia Mancuso
Just make sure that you let us know what it is you do end up with!
A Mini is also not a bad idea.
1) Get a refurbished one to save some bucks. Max out the RAM yourself - save bucks over Apple doing it.
2) Add FW external HDDs for storage. They can be used on a Mac Pro or an iMac later on.
3) With the money saved on the Mini, you can get a high quality monitor. Also transferable to a Mac Pro or an iMac later (as a 2nd monitor). A good monitor can used for several to many years comfortably. Imho, it's better to produce better photos (because the monitor is accurate) and wait some extra seconds, than to get a faster computer but put out photos with inaccurate colour.
4) Start investing in the SW tools that you will want/need. These are also transferable to a new system.
5) When you finally spring for a fully loaded, 24 core, 512MB RAM, 72 TB Storage, 4 graphic cards, 4 Thunderbolt ports iMac Pro Supreme Tower all of the peripherals and software moves too.
It's how I got started. A small Mini with a 23" ACD. Everything I bought to go with it also had to work with a (future) Mac Pro. Eventually I was working with Photoshop files that were approaching 1GB, on a Mini with only 1GB of memory (the days when opening a Mini involved spludging).
There was a lot of HDD thrashing. I was afraid that PS would crash, so I saved often. It took so long to save a big file, that I could go out and mow the lawn or do the dishes while it thrashed away. I got a lot of housework done that summer. Ironically, that Mini never crashed. Not once.
Eventually I got my current Mac Pro, and it was like moving from steam trains to warp drive. All the peripherals and SW moved too, so the only cost was the Mac Pro itself plus the extra HDDs I added at the time.
That Mini then got hooked up the TV where it served up all of our music throughout the house, and movies to the TV for a couple of years. I've upgraded that Mini to a newer one but the first one still works, and I keep it as a spare.
Nah... I just feel sentimental for it. What a workhorse!
Thank You for sharing as that is what I am thinking. I will buy 1333 ram no matter the machine I take home. I saw several refurb minis a few days ago, they were $500 or so.
Josh2022
Sep 15, 07:08 PM
"Crappy Product" - Thats why i dont wanna write about it, cause it doesnt show how awsome Apple is =\
Givmeabrek
Apr 14, 02:04 PM
That's just stupid. How can you have the display come to the edge with no protection or support. :eek:
He,he....just noticed the file name......concept.jpg.
He,he....just noticed the file name......concept.jpg.
TheMacBookPro
Apr 28, 10:31 AM
Well there's the clear Speck shell case.
I have the satin/matte black one on my Air and it doesn't add too much bulk/weight and it solves the hinge 'issue' (can't open with one hand easily b/c the bottom lifts up). Quite like it.
Haven't noticed any other similar cases yet (all the other 11" Air cases seem to be sleeves).
I have the satin/matte black one on my Air and it doesn't add too much bulk/weight and it solves the hinge 'issue' (can't open with one hand easily b/c the bottom lifts up). Quite like it.
Haven't noticed any other similar cases yet (all the other 11" Air cases seem to be sleeves).
decksnap
Oct 26, 10:54 AM
At the very least, resolution independence is no worse than changing the display resolution. If you change the display resolution, the monitor is simply doing scaling automatically to match it to the native resolution. However, it's scaling the entire screen as a single bitmap. This is why the screen looks blurry if you run at anything but the native resolution. (Note: This is with LCDs.)
With resolution indepence, at worst you do the same type of scaling in the OS. However in this case, the scaling algorithm affects only one app, the algorithm can be updated, and it can be better than the one used by the monitor.
And now they won't have to.
I guess we'll agree to disagree, and wait to find out. We already know that Apple knows that scaling things up will result in a loss of quality, or else they wouldn't be rebuilding all their graphics.
With resolution indepence, at worst you do the same type of scaling in the OS. However in this case, the scaling algorithm affects only one app, the algorithm can be updated, and it can be better than the one used by the monitor.
And now they won't have to.
I guess we'll agree to disagree, and wait to find out. We already know that Apple knows that scaling things up will result in a loss of quality, or else they wouldn't be rebuilding all their graphics.
Lemming
Jan 5, 12:13 AM
I don't have any pictures of my iBook, just sent it in for *gasp* logic board replacment! I got a good picture of the monitor though, it was doing some freaky stuff.
digitalbiker
Oct 25, 12:04 AM
Yeah, sorry. Those too.:)
What do you mean? Are you talking about Leopard? Leopard will work with Core 2 Duo, Core Duo, PPC, probably everything back to about a 1997 model imac.
However Leopard will only provide 64 bit support to 64 bit capable chips, that would be G5 PPC and Core 2 Duo only.
What do you mean? Are you talking about Leopard? Leopard will work with Core 2 Duo, Core Duo, PPC, probably everything back to about a 1997 model imac.
However Leopard will only provide 64 bit support to 64 bit capable chips, that would be G5 PPC and Core 2 Duo only.
Cabbit
Mar 8, 05:24 AM
Pop round to your local 2nd shop for lens, on ebay just now is a 18-55is + 100-300 usm for �160 the pair. Some of the older lens are horrid but there are also real gems out there. Just look for a lens and type out its name + review into google and see what people are saying about it.
floyde
Nov 19, 08:58 PM
i'd hope someone who is able to code to figure out to google his answer especially for something like an asp shopping cart....
:o true, sorry about the laziness. I couldn't find anything worthwile so I thought it'd be good to get some advice from the good people at MR. The problem with googling "ASP .NET shopping cart" is that the first 1000 pages or so will be about non-free stuff. Adding "open source" or "free" didn't improve the results that much either. I think I'm going to give PHP another shot since there's tons of open source stuff for it.
:o true, sorry about the laziness. I couldn't find anything worthwile so I thought it'd be good to get some advice from the good people at MR. The problem with googling "ASP .NET shopping cart" is that the first 1000 pages or so will be about non-free stuff. Adding "open source" or "free" didn't improve the results that much either. I think I'm going to give PHP another shot since there's tons of open source stuff for it.
grapes911
Dec 14, 02:50 AM
If you don't calibrate your battery, the battery monitor will be incorrect. The compter may think the battery is empty when it is not and force sleep. The computer may think it is full when it is not and not charge all the way. You don't have calibrate it right away. Do a full charge that night while you sleep. Then don't charge it again after you use all the battery. The discharge doesn't have to happen all at once, but the recharge does.
Powerbook G5
Sep 21, 12:05 AM
We broke the servers! How about that. I guess we wore them out... ;)
SR20DETDOG
Mar 10, 09:37 PM
You are basically moving the bandwidth requirements to another server. It depends on what the second host allows.
That sounds promising.
My plan is to host the files from my Dropbox, giving me a good 2GB of space from the 40MB I think I have now. I'm not sure how bandwidth works with Dropbox since it's not a web host. I assume it will work fine, otherwise I'll just have to cough up some money :(
That sounds promising.
My plan is to host the files from my Dropbox, giving me a good 2GB of space from the 40MB I think I have now. I'm not sure how bandwidth works with Dropbox since it's not a web host. I assume it will work fine, otherwise I'll just have to cough up some money :(
bella92108
Apr 26, 06:24 PM
Apologies to all, didn't know multiple folks were still working on it.
This is good news...
By the time it's jailbroken it'll be time for iOS 5 and everyone will want that. I hope I'm wrong. I returned my iPad 2 after waiting a month for jailbreak. My opinion is we won't see a JB anytime soon, but I hope I'm wrong. I switched from iPhone to Android Phone, and haven't looked back. I can't use an iOS device anymore without jailbreak, so I really hope the JB for iPad comes out before the Samsung tablet this summer, otherwise I think I'm done with iPad for good... seems to be a growing bit of contention with iPad owners. Here's hoping for a quick JB
This is good news...
By the time it's jailbroken it'll be time for iOS 5 and everyone will want that. I hope I'm wrong. I returned my iPad 2 after waiting a month for jailbreak. My opinion is we won't see a JB anytime soon, but I hope I'm wrong. I switched from iPhone to Android Phone, and haven't looked back. I can't use an iOS device anymore without jailbreak, so I really hope the JB for iPad comes out before the Samsung tablet this summer, otherwise I think I'm done with iPad for good... seems to be a growing bit of contention with iPad owners. Here's hoping for a quick JB
MacRumors
Apr 4, 03:44 PM
http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif (http://www.macrumors.com/2011/04/04/macbook-air-evolving-into-mainstream-product/)
williamnova
Mar 10, 02:13 PM
Hi, I'm doing some research into the 10.6 OS I've come across two pieces of seemingly conflicting documentation.
In the Network Services Admin 10.6 PDF (http://images.apple.com/server/macosx/docs/Network_Services_Admin_v10.6.pdf) on pages 23-24 I'm reading "Mac OS X Server uses the xinetd process to manage many UNIX network services, such as FTP, finger, and so on. xinetd listens for requests on specific TCP/IP sockets and is a secure replacement for inetd. However, because xinetd does not handle RPC services well, inetd and xinetd are included with Mac OS X."
But Apple TN2083 (http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#technotes/tn2005/tn2083.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/DTS10003794) says "Starting with Mac OS X 10.4, inetd and xinetd daemons are deprecated in favor of launchd daemons; a launchd daemon can specify a list of TCP and UDP ports to listen on as part of its property list file. Starting with Mac OS X 10.5, inetd and xinetd daemons are no longer supported. However, it's easy to run an existing inetd or xinetd daemon by creating and installing a simple launchd property list file (resulting in an inetd-compatible launchd daemon). For an example of this, check out /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/finger.plist."
Can anybody shed some light on this? I have a feeling the TN is correct, but it would make me sad to find out that Apple's own server documentation is out of date. I'd attempt to poke around in the system myself, but sadly I can't afford a copy of 10.6 server. Lion can't come fast enough!
Thanks in advance for any info anybody can provide.
In the Network Services Admin 10.6 PDF (http://images.apple.com/server/macosx/docs/Network_Services_Admin_v10.6.pdf) on pages 23-24 I'm reading "Mac OS X Server uses the xinetd process to manage many UNIX network services, such as FTP, finger, and so on. xinetd listens for requests on specific TCP/IP sockets and is a secure replacement for inetd. However, because xinetd does not handle RPC services well, inetd and xinetd are included with Mac OS X."
But Apple TN2083 (http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#technotes/tn2005/tn2083.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/DTS10003794) says "Starting with Mac OS X 10.4, inetd and xinetd daemons are deprecated in favor of launchd daemons; a launchd daemon can specify a list of TCP and UDP ports to listen on as part of its property list file. Starting with Mac OS X 10.5, inetd and xinetd daemons are no longer supported. However, it's easy to run an existing inetd or xinetd daemon by creating and installing a simple launchd property list file (resulting in an inetd-compatible launchd daemon). For an example of this, check out /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/finger.plist."
Can anybody shed some light on this? I have a feeling the TN is correct, but it would make me sad to find out that Apple's own server documentation is out of date. I'd attempt to poke around in the system myself, but sadly I can't afford a copy of 10.6 server. Lion can't come fast enough!
Thanks in advance for any info anybody can provide.
HomeBru Studios
Feb 10, 08:48 PM
Is the URL correct for where you are posting to? Your sample looked to be an absolute address so you might be missing part of the path?!?
NZed
Apr 20, 06:06 PM
what is SB MBA?
Sandy Bridge Processors which are the new generation of processors that right now we see in the new i3, i5 and i7 but there will be more upcoming cores that use this technology.
Sandy Bridge Processors which are the new generation of processors that right now we see in the new i3, i5 and i7 but there will be more upcoming cores that use this technology.
Richard Bleiche
Oct 26, 06:13 PM
This has got to be a decoy patent. Because if it's not:
(1) How do you design a case to protect it while exposing the bezel 360 degrees around so you can touch it? No coverage in front? Actually, a case couldn't even have a lip to hold it on because your finger would have to get in there to press upon the bezel.
(2) How do you realistically even pick it up or move it if pushing the bezel on nearly any side activates these programmed dynamic buttons? You'd have to Lock it every time you want to touch the thing so you don't activate some function.
This would be a terrible form-does-not-follow-function idea.
(1) How do you design a case to protect it while exposing the bezel 360 degrees around so you can touch it? No coverage in front? Actually, a case couldn't even have a lip to hold it on because your finger would have to get in there to press upon the bezel.
(2) How do you realistically even pick it up or move it if pushing the bezel on nearly any side activates these programmed dynamic buttons? You'd have to Lock it every time you want to touch the thing so you don't activate some function.
This would be a terrible form-does-not-follow-function idea.
No comments:
Post a Comment