thejadedmonkey
Oct 26, 09:46 AM
I notice that the fingers in the diagram look small. A little research shows the average male index finger dip joint (last joint at the finger) is about 1cm long. Doing some quick calculations, assuming ANYTHING in the diagram is to scale, the device seems to be about 7" tall. The current Ipod is 4.1" tall. Also, the diagram shows the ability to add to playlist, which leads me to believe it is more than an ipod... perhaps I am completely wrong, of course
Are you insinuating something.....
perhaps that this is not an iPod after all, but rather an iTablet?:eek:
Are you insinuating something.....
perhaps that this is not an iPod after all, but rather an iTablet?:eek:
DsurioN
Jan 22, 11:08 PM
Apparently, for accounting reasons, they have to sell the update for $2 because they are adding functionality to products that have already shipped. (From the MacRumors front page)
yellow
Dec 19, 01:36 PM
I had Googled for a Roman Numeral for "million" but came up unsatisfied.
Full of Win
Apr 18, 11:28 AM
Oh I completely agree. You put a 2G and a 3G side by side and you can barely tell them apart.
:|
Sarcasm aside, if you look at them internally, the iPhone 1 and iPhone 2 (3G) are almost identical. Even Apple acknowledged this by calling the iPhone 3G the iPhone 1,2 internally. The first iPhone to get a iPhone 2,1 designation was the iPhone 3GS, indicating it was a new design. If the iPhone 3G was a 'complete redesign' as you said, Apple would have named it with a new internal code to reflect this; however it did not.
Seriously - people think that an exterior update is more significant that the internals...? The 3GS was serious update over the 3G - faster processor, better camera with video, better BT, faster 3G, better screen, higher capacity, etc.
The 2G > 3G update was the lamest of the bunch so far (especially since a lot of people agree the metal case was a better decision than the plastic)
Exactly. Why cannot every see this? The iPhone 3GS was a massive jump internally over the iPhone 1 / iPhone 2 (3G). The 3G was one of the lamest of the iPhone updates to date.
:|
Sarcasm aside, if you look at them internally, the iPhone 1 and iPhone 2 (3G) are almost identical. Even Apple acknowledged this by calling the iPhone 3G the iPhone 1,2 internally. The first iPhone to get a iPhone 2,1 designation was the iPhone 3GS, indicating it was a new design. If the iPhone 3G was a 'complete redesign' as you said, Apple would have named it with a new internal code to reflect this; however it did not.
Seriously - people think that an exterior update is more significant that the internals...? The 3GS was serious update over the 3G - faster processor, better camera with video, better BT, faster 3G, better screen, higher capacity, etc.
The 2G > 3G update was the lamest of the bunch so far (especially since a lot of people agree the metal case was a better decision than the plastic)
Exactly. Why cannot every see this? The iPhone 3GS was a massive jump internally over the iPhone 1 / iPhone 2 (3G). The 3G was one of the lamest of the iPhone updates to date.
rufus1
Dec 6, 07:47 AM
Hello,
I need a replacement power supply for my Mac G4 Quicksilver (part 614-0157) but all the prices I've seen are outrageous. I am in the process of converting an ATX power supply for use in the Mac but I discovered that I do not have a +25V line. Is there an adapter or alternative power supply that will give me 25V?
These are the specifications on the Mac PSU:
+250VS 4.5A
+250VL 2.5A
I appreciate any help that could help me bring my Mac back to life. It is currently a stylish paperweight.
I need a replacement power supply for my Mac G4 Quicksilver (part 614-0157) but all the prices I've seen are outrageous. I am in the process of converting an ATX power supply for use in the Mac but I discovered that I do not have a +25V line. Is there an adapter or alternative power supply that will give me 25V?
These are the specifications on the Mac PSU:
+250VS 4.5A
+250VL 2.5A
I appreciate any help that could help me bring my Mac back to life. It is currently a stylish paperweight.
dalvin200
Jan 10, 06:14 AM
i thought the same thing
marcellus7
Mar 7, 12:43 PM
I was thinking of heading up there about 3pm or so. I dunno if thats too early or too late, lol
hansiedejong
Nov 5, 05:27 PM
My Friend:
http://www.onemorething.nl/uploads/community/26fb57fb664b46ed77d21eae7414a2a82551eba0_0.png
http://www.onemorething.nl/uploads/community/26fb57fb664b46ed77d21eae7414a2a82551eba0_0.png
bitabytex
Oct 26, 06:54 AM
The controls look kinda cumbersome. I'm pretty sure I wouldn't like to lift my hand and move it completely around the iPod area like you would need to to get to the next track, ect. Plus, with the regular iPod, my fingers usually rest around those areas that would be touch-sensitive, probably causing me to skip tracks or what-not, and it would seem to be kinda difficult to use with one hand, as I do now with the current line-up.
Hopefully they would address these issues before release because it does look neat. :D
p.s. My first post! I've been sifting through the forums for a year and a half, and now just decided to register! lol
Hopefully they would address these issues before release because it does look neat. :D
p.s. My first post! I've been sifting through the forums for a year and a half, and now just decided to register! lol
dejo
Apr 20, 05:55 PM
When an app is rejected by Apple's App Store review process, do they tell you all the issues that's wrong with the app? Or do they stop after finding the first issue that's wrong?
My experience has always been that they stop at the first issue. Then there can be a whole series of fixes, submissions, reviews, and rejections. Each iteration brings you closer to approval but never with any feel for how close you might be. But your mileage may vary.
My experience has always been that they stop at the first issue. Then there can be a whole series of fixes, submissions, reviews, and rejections. Each iteration brings you closer to approval but never with any feel for how close you might be. But your mileage may vary.
baryon
May 4, 10:37 AM
That would be great indeed! There's a Safari extension that does that, but it's terrrrribly bad and it doesn't really work either. Safari extensions are all cr*p.
aafuss1
Oct 24, 05:58 PM
Full screen in QuickTime in Leopard, please.
MacFan25
Jul 8, 04:59 PM
Originally posted by Bob Dobbs
according to Temp Monitor i am at 140F
How do you get to the temp monitor? I looked in utilities, but couldn't find anything.
according to Temp Monitor i am at 140F
How do you get to the temp monitor? I looked in utilities, but couldn't find anything.
robotrenegade
Mar 29, 03:15 PM
Where can I buy it at?
kalex
Apr 17, 02:32 PM
Same here. There is nothing in 4.3.1 or 4.3.2 that I need and from previous experience if it ain't broke don't touch it.
Peter Griffin
Sep 15, 07:22 PM
Yea, childrens story, best song ever.
Mona Lisa is a good one too.
Mona Lisa is a good one too.
RipcordAFF
Nov 12, 12:08 AM
My new one
original please?
original please?
v66jack
Mar 18, 10:06 AM
I didn't realise that you could make nice looking sites with iWeb. Especially as your first site - its awesome.
Based on me not understanding a word. Advice would be, maybe make it a bit clearer that you have to click the image to access the site, try and loose the Apple logo at the bottom - I think it looks at bit unprofessional. But apart from that its pretty good.
Based on me not understanding a word. Advice would be, maybe make it a bit clearer that you have to click the image to access the site, try and loose the Apple logo at the bottom - I think it looks at bit unprofessional. But apart from that its pretty good.
chown33
Apr 21, 07:13 PM
I looked into getcwd, and I was able to get the directory of the executable. I wrote some code to modify the path to go up a couple of folders, and I verified that it did the correct modifications. Furthemore, I found that the program worked just fine when I opened the package contents of the .app file and ran the executable inside the MacOS folder from Terminal.
However, the .app will not run from Finder.
Running the executable using Terminal, after cd'ing into the .app Contents/Resources is not the same thing as running it from Finder.
You should look at the working directory when run from Finder, using the debugger if you have to.
You're making a faulty generalization based on what happens in Terminal. In particular, I can almost guarantee that launching from Finder DOES NOT set the working directory to the location of the executable.
However, the .app will not run from Finder.
Running the executable using Terminal, after cd'ing into the .app Contents/Resources is not the same thing as running it from Finder.
You should look at the working directory when run from Finder, using the debugger if you have to.
You're making a faulty generalization based on what happens in Terminal. In particular, I can almost guarantee that launching from Finder DOES NOT set the working directory to the location of the executable.
malch
May 5, 11:59 AM
Hi there,
I just attached a 3rd display (all Dells; one connected via DVI, the other two via DP->miniDP), and now my MP won't start up. None of the displays show anything (they stay black) and the MP doesn't make the chime after I push the button, as it should.
Am I doing something wrong?
malch
I just attached a 3rd display (all Dells; one connected via DVI, the other two via DP->miniDP), and now my MP won't start up. None of the displays show anything (they stay black) and the MP doesn't make the chime after I push the button, as it should.
Am I doing something wrong?
malch
longofest
Jun 15, 01:41 PM
I'm down with the Analyst prefix, and we could have an Analyst directory page
EDIT: on second thought, the "Firstname Lastname (Analyst)" might work better for linking from the front page... flows better.
EDIT: on second thought, the "Firstname Lastname (Analyst)" might work better for linking from the front page... flows better.
gauriemma
Oct 26, 11:18 AM
Am I the only one out there who's just not all that excited about the idea of a "Video" iPod? I like the iPod. I've had one since about three weeks after they first came out. It's a great music player. I don't want the entire thing to be a screen. The new 80GB models should hold me for quite a while, thank you.
minik
Jan 16, 07:55 PM
I only saw the whole MacBreak weekly crew.
pgwalsh
Jan 30, 03:54 AM
Welcome to the Mac community. You'll find people here that have some great knowledge. I have a G3 400 and I think OS X rocks on it. Can't complain too much about speed. Going to ZIF it soon.
No comments:
Post a Comment